Pissing in the Media Pool
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | ||||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
Blogroll
- Akemi: Makeup Artist
- All Goldluxx
- Blog of the Day
- blogger news network
- Citizen Kim
- coraline
- Death by 1000 Papercuts
- for stardoll girls!
- henry rollins
- I went to ur house party
- igor + andre
- impeach bush
- its a mystery to me
- Me Importa Un Pepino
- PaperDoll Australia
- Patrishka’s Open Mouth Art Store
- please don’t stare
- Q Tumbler
- Reality is no my Friend
- Richie Madden Foundation
- Sassi Sam’s Girlie Gossip
- Shouted Whisper
- Stardolls
- temporary like achilles
- The Caylee Bears
- Trailer Park Boys
- west memphis 3
- WordPress.org
- Words Are Fixed to Hurt
- yearbook yourself
ella es guapa y punto. y encima se le da el tenis q te cagas, pero tiene el gusto en el culo por salir con enrique iglesias… (que feooooo!!!!) enfin…
traduction
She is pretty, and that´s all. She plays tennis very well too, but she likes ugly guys (enrique iglesias) buaaaaajjjhhh!! xD
oh my…she still wonderfull…fuck the gay as wrote if she´s ugly
Wow! She’s still gorgeous….To the jerk who called Anna ugly…I am sure she looks better without makeup than 90% of women on earth! Too bad jealous people have to hate on her, oh well the haters are prolly ugly anyway!…She looks NORMAL and NATURAL, why is this such a bad thing?
Human males & females are extremely similar physically.
When you take away things like makeup and female clothing & hairstyles, there’s little left to distinguish a woman from a man.
When the commenter says she’s ugly in this photo, it’s because, in this photo, she’s lacking one of the key things that modern human males depend on to indicate female gender.
ie, she’s ugly in this picture because she looks too much like a dude.
And, for the record, humans don’t come in the flavor “gorgeous”.
As far as looks go, humans are somewhere between a sloth and an armadillo.
You can lie to yourself all you want but, from an outside, uninfluenced POV, the words awkward, hideous and frightening are better choices when trying to describe the appearance of humans.
I think that’s more an indication of the women you perceive to be “normal” rather than anything else.
There is such a thing as biological normality. Biologically _normal_ men and women are easy to distinguish. And it’s not (all) to do with curves/boobs. Their cranial/facial/body biometry as well as posture, attitudinal nature and demeanour (all higher function driven processes) are very distinct.
Sure, if you take an effeminate “male”, and put it next to a masculinised “female”, and use these as yardsticks of normality, then you’re going to have problems in terms of gender discernment. And again, as an aside, this is not all to do with form: Musclier, for men, does not always equal more masculine. If anything, especially for those who work out to be “body beautiful” rather than functionally strong, it is more an indicator of effeminacy and self-sensualisation. Demeanour, posture and attitude are critical in gender discernment and gender identity.
fuckin ugly